From the bestselling authors of Wittgenstein's Pokerthe quarrel that shocked the world of Enlightenment. Jean-Jacques Rousseau - philosopher, novelist, composer, educationist, political provocateur - was on the run. He was fleeing intolerance, persecution, and enemies who proclaimed him a madman, dangerous to society. David Hume, the foremost philosopher in the English language, universally praised as a model of decency, came to his aid. He brought Rousseau and his beloved little dog Sultan to England. And then it all went horribly wrong. In Rousseau's DogDavid Edmonds and John Eidinow bring their narrative verve to the bitter quarrel that turned these two Enlightenment giants into mortal foes. The result is a story of celebrity and its price, of shameless spin, of destroyed reputations and shattered friendships. It is a story of two men whose writings would forever shape our world, but whose personalities and ideas could scarcely have had less in common. And it is a very human story of compassion, treachery, anger and revenge. Satın alma seçenekleri ve eklentiler. Bu ürünle ilgili bir sorun bildirin. Ürün ayrıntılarının önceki slaydı. Yayınlanma Tarihi. Tüm ayrıntıları göster. Ürün ayrıntılarının sonraki slaydı. Müşteri Yorumları. Puanlar nasıl hesaplanır? Toplam yıldız puanını ve yıldıza göre yüzde dökümünü hesaplamak için basit bir ortalama kullanmayız. Bunun yerine, sistemimiz bir yorumun ne kadar yeni olduğu ve yorum yapan kullanıcının ürünü Amazon'dan satın alıp almadığı gibi şeyleri değerlendirir. Sistemimiz, ayrıca Wittgensteins Poker Rousseaus Dog A Tale Of Two Philosophers doğrulamak için yorumları analiz eder. Bu ürünü incele Düşüncelerinizi diğer müşteriler ile paylaşın. Müşteri yorumu yazın. Bu incelemedeki görüntüler. Şu ülkeden en iyi değerlendirmeler: Türkiye. Türkiye: 0 yorum ve 0 müşteri puanı var. Diğer ülkelerden en iyi değerlendirmeler. Tüm değerlendirmeleri Türkçe'ye çevir. Doğrulanmış Alışveriş. On one hand, it's possible to see this book as a description of a petty clash between two important-but-all-too-human intellectuals that elicits no more than a "So what? And that would be quite accurate. It's somewhat disconcerting to read about the foibles of two Great Minds and realize that you wouldn't want to be stuck in a stalled elevator with either one of them. On the other hand, this is a fascinating look into the affairs sometimes literally The famous spat between Rousseau and Hume took place at a time when all of the important thinkers, writers, and authors in Europe knew one another and communicated regularly and voluminously. This is even more notable because so many of the classic big names in philosophy and literature were citizens of that Republic of Letters.
And that would be quite accurate. The book is really about nothing, to put it succinctly. Full of juicy gossip like a modern scandal sheet, the characters of David Hume and Jean-Jacque Rousseau are brought to life, often in their own words, to remind us that even the wisest of philosophers are still human. Using a single incident for the jumping off point, it allows for an opening for a broad view of Enlightenment society and the state of philosophy in that era. The result is a story of celebrity and its price, of shameless spin, of destroyed reputations and shattered friendships.
Ekim 12, 2020
II. Dünya Savaşı sırasında donanmada görev yaptıktan sonra Antioch. Alanında büyük bir etki yaratmış olan Amerikalı antropolog. From the author of Wittgenstein's Poker and Would You Kill the Fat Man?, the story of an extraordinary group of philosophers during a dark chapter in. Dog: Animal Cruelty, Self, and Society, , , Temple Two Contemporary Accounts of Martin Luther, , philosophy, there are two different approaches to these questions which are the main , 45 Murat Baç, “Wittgenstein ve Anlamın Ortalıkta Olması”, Felsefe.Başa dön. The functioning of The Republic of Letters is in reality the main character and the point of this book. Diğer ülkelerden en iyi değerlendirmeler. Puanlar nasıl hesaplanır? I first started reading this book several years ago and I quit it after about 50 pages. Additionally, the writing itself is not very good. Bizimle Para Kazanın. Daha Fazla Göster. Hemen sohbet edelim. This is even more notable because so many of the classic big names in philosophy and literature were citizens of that Republic of Letters. Bu ürünle ilgili bir sorun bildirin. Using a single incident for the jumping off point, it allows for an opening for a broad view of Enlightenment society and the state of philosophy in that era. The rest of the book is a meandering tale about these two philosophers' interactions which had nothing to do with philosophy and their personal and petty disputes. My suggestion is: don't waste your time reading this. Full of juicy gossip like a modern scandal sheet, the characters of David Hume and Jean-Jacque Rousseau are brought to life, often in their own words, to remind us that even the wisest of philosophers are still human. The functioning of The Republic of Letters is in reality the main character and the point of this book. From the bestselling authors of Wittgenstein's Poker , the quarrel that shocked the world of Enlightenment. On the other hand, this is a fascinating look into the affairs sometimes literally Frankly, without even looking at the sources, one could surmise that at least some of it is based on rumors. Ürün ayrıntılarının sonraki slaydı. Puanlar nasıl hesaplanır? So, the reviewers who criticize the book as nothing more than petty gossip are right, but they are missing the point. Müşteri yorumu yazın. Diğer ülkelerden en iyi değerlendirmeler. On one hand, it's possible to see this book as a description of a petty clash between two important-but-all-too-human intellectuals that elicits no more than a "So what?
